Human minds are curious yet stubborn. Despite overwhelming evidence, we often cling to long-held beliefs as if our identities depend on them. Understanding why facts fail to sway us isn’t just fascinating—it’s essential. It reveals why meaningful change requires more than just presenting evidence. Have you ever wondered why some people stick to their beliefs instead of reevaluating them? This article will uncover the reasons behind this behavior and provide you with steps to change your perspective and help others do the same. (Estimated reading time: 12 minutes)
“A rigid mind is very sure but often wrong. A flexible mind is generally unsure, but often right.”
– Vanda Scaravelli
Imagine sitting across from someone who insists the Earth is flat or denies overwhelming scientific evidence about climate change. Despite mounting evidence, they refuse to budge.
It’s a scenario we’ve all encountered, right? The frustration of facing beliefs that seem impervious to undeniable facts. But what’s really going on when people cling to beliefs and stand firm in the face of overwhelming evidence?
Many of us need to tiptoe around these subjects because they’re so deeply ingrained in our identity and beliefs about who we are. These beliefs often connect us to a group, a culture, or a shared story. When someone attacks them, it’s like they’re attacking you and your tribe. Understanding this insight might help you when having conversations about touchy topics like politics and religion.
If you try speaking with someone who vehemently supports a different political party, it can often lead to a strong reaction, along with a barrage of justifications for their leader’s actions, regardless of the situation. Whether it’s a close friend or a family member, they often passionately and resolutely stand by their political beliefs.
Living in the digital age only compounds this. It’s easier than ever to live in an echo chamber that allows us to cling to beliefs. Algorithms on platforms like Facebook and YouTube serve up content that mirrors your preferences. This creates the illusion that everyone agrees with you, inflating your confidence, even if the broader reality says otherwise.
If you believe a conspiracy theory and watch one video about it, algorithms might recommend twenty more. You’re pulled deeper into a rabbit hole, and opposing viewpoints become increasingly distant.
The bottom line is that beliefs are not just ideas we hold; they are powerful forces. They connect us and provide a framework for understanding the world. But they can also become barriers instead of bridges when they close us off from reality.
The next time you find yourself in a conversation with someone holding onto a belief that runs counter to the facts, remember this: it’s rarely about the facts themselves but the way our brains are wired. Approach the conversation with a healthy dose of compassion. After all, who among us doesn’t cling tightly to something we believe in?
The comfort of familiarity: why we cling to beliefs
Beliefs are more than just ideas. They’re part of your identity and woven into your emotional fabric. This isn’t just about logic—it’s deeply emotional, which is why it’s important to consider the impact emotions have on our thought process.
1. Emotional decision-making and its role in belief
Our emotions don’t just color our decisions; they often serve as their foundation. While we like to think of ourselves as logical beings, the truth is that our emotional responses play a dominant role in shaping what we believe and how we act.
Emotions guide our judgment, reward us when we click to beliefs, and even protect our sense of identity in the face of conflicting evidence. Understanding this interplay helps explain why facts alone rarely change someone’s mind.
Two main influences affect how we emotionally process information: our amygdala, also known as our emotional brain, and dopamine, the feel-good hormone.
- The emotional brain: amygdala’s influence on beliefs
At the center of emotional decision-making lies the amygdala—an almond-shaped cluster deep within the brain. Think of the amygdala as your internal alarm system, constantly scanning for potential threats. When faced with something it perceives as dangerous, whether that’s a physical threat or an idea that challenges your beliefs, it springs into action.
This phenomenon isn’t always harmful. It’s an evolutionary safeguard. Early humans relied on the amygdala’s rapid assessments to survive life-or-death situations, such as evading predators.
However, in our modern world, the same mechanism can misinterpret challenges to our beliefs as existential threats. When emotions take over, rational thinking gets sidelined. It’s no wonder that even undeniable facts can bounce right off an emotionally fortified belief system.
- The dopamine effect: why winning feels good
If the amygdala governs fear, dopamine is the brain’s reward currency. Dopamine isn’t just about making us feel good. It reinforces behaviors that the brain deems beneficial. Defending your beliefs can trigger a dopamine release, especially when you “win” an argument or feel validated by others. It’s like hitting a jackpot every time someone agrees with you.
Here’s a simple analogy: Imagine you’re defending a cherished belief online, and someone responds with, “You’re so right!” Your brain treats this validation like a reward, reinforcing that belief even more. This feedback loop makes it increasingly satisfying to double down on your opinions and cling to beliefs, whether or not they align with reality. Over time, the act of defending your beliefs can become addictive, like a dopamine-fueled habit you can’t shake.
This biochemical push and pull is why logic often loses out in a debate. Facts engage the prefrontal cortex—the slower, more deliberate part of the brain—but emotions like fear and validation fire up faster, grabbing the wheel before logic gets a chance to buckle in. If you’ve ever wondered why emotional arguments often win the day, you can thank your brain’s innate wiring.
- Confirmation bias: the mental shortcut that keeps you out of conflict
Have you ever ignored evidence that contradicted your views? That’s confirmation bias at work. This psychological phenomenon nudges you to seek out information that reinforces what you already believe while dismissing or tweaking facts that don’t.
For example, if you believe that eating gluten is unhealthy for everyone, you’re more likely to notice articles or studies that back up your stance. You might even overlook well-documented evidence showing it’s safe for most people. Social media often supercharges this behavior by shoving like-minded content into your feed, creating “filter bubbles” that insulate you from opposing views.
2. The role of social connections in strengthening beliefs
In addition to our emotions and biochemistry, our beliefs are deeply tied to the relationships we form and the communities we belong to. As social creatures, humans naturally seek approval from those around them. This need for connection and belonging often outweighs the desire for accuracy or truth. The strength of a belief is usually reinforced, not by evidence, but by the people who share it.
To understand why facts don’t always change minds, we must first examine how social connections shape and strengthen what we believe based on two phenomena: tribalism and proximity.
- Tribalism: why identity matters more than fact
Our belief systems are tightly interwoven with our sense of identity and belonging. In many cases, beliefs are less about truth and more about what they symbolize within a community. This phenomenon is rooted in tribalism, which refers to the innate human tendency to form and prioritize in-groups.
When a belief is tied to your tribe, changing that belief can feel like a threat to your identity. Imagine the emotional turmoil of someone who has grown up in a community that strongly associates a scientific, political, or cultural belief with shared values. Rejecting that belief may lead to rejection by their friends, family, or peers. The stakes are high, emotionally and socially, so facts alone struggle to penetrate these deep connections.
To complicate matters further, people are often reluctant to leave one group unless they have another to step into. Asking someone to rethink their stance without offering an alternative community is like asking them to walk into emotional exile, leaving them isolated, disconnected, and emotionally vulnerable. Simply put, humans often cling to beliefs and gravitate toward belonging, often at the cost of truth.
- Proximity and understanding: the power of social interactions
If tribalism builds walls, proximity tears them down. When we interact with people outside our usual circles, we create opportunities for understanding and empathy. The simple act of human connection—a shared laugh, a meal, or a kind gesture—can dissolve barriers that facts alone could never touch.
Personal proximity fosters empathy. It deconstructs the abstract “us versus them” mentality that breeds animosity. Empirical studies back this up: communities with higher levels of inter-group interactions report lower levels of hostility. If you’ve ever felt less inclined to argue with a neighbor after having a friendly chat, you’ve experienced this phenomenon firsthand.
But proximity alone isn’t enough. It must also happen in a non-threatening, relaxed environment. This is why meals, casual gatherings, or low-stakes activities are so effective. They allow conversations to unfold organically. Imagine someone handing you a book or sharing a personal anecdote over dinner. It feels less like an argument and more like an invitation to consider another perspective.
Why do false ideas persist?
False ideas can spread like wildfire, often thriving even in the face of overwhelming evidence. While it seems logical that facts should drive out inaccuracies, the reality is far more nuanced. Ideas, true or false, are sticky because they serve a psychological, emotional, and larger social narrative.
To understand why falsehoods take root and endure, we must examine how humans process information and how repetition fuels their resilience within this social context.
- The backfire effect: when facts strengthen misconceptions
Imagine someone trying to correct a friend’s misguided belief with a detailed list of facts. More often than not, the friend might double down instead of reconsidering, becoming even more convinced of their original perspective.
This is known as the backfire effect; a psychological phenomenon where attempts to correct misinformation inadvertently strengthen the false belief instead.
Why does this happen? Correcting misinformation directly challenges a person’s worldview. When beliefs are tied to identity, being wrong feels like an attack on who they are.
This is why bombarding people with data rarely works, especially when the topic is emotionally or socially sensitive. Whether debating climate change, vaccine safety, or election outcomes, providing corrections without addressing the emotional stakes can entrench the very ideas you’re trying to dismantle. In this context, facts are like fire extinguishers that accidentally fuel the flames because people will continue to cling to beliefs that matter to them.
- Silence and relevance: how ideas thrive or fade
Not all ideas need to be debated. Some simply lose power when left to fade into silence. This brings us to an important insight: repetition keeps bad ideas alive, just like an old song stuck in your head long after it’s stopped playing. Starving bad tunes of airtime is often the best way to reclaim a clearer, more truthful narrative.
Consider the human brain. We’re wired to remember things we hear repeatedly. Even with false notions, familiarity breeds acceptance because repeated exposure tricks the mind into thinking something is valid. Psychologists call this the illusory truth effect—the tendency to believe something just because we’ve heard it multiple times. The more an idea circulates, the more normal it feels, regardless of its factual accuracy.
James Clear coined a concept known as Clear’s Law of Recurrence, which states, “The number of people who believe an idea is directly proportional to the number of times it has been repeated in the past year.” Even when disproven, reiteration keeps the idea alive. This is why conspiracy theories and pseudoscience persist—people on both sides of the debate keep talking about them.
Ironically, even criticism can give false ideas oxygen. For instance, when we continuously refute misinformation on social media, we inadvertently amplify its reach. Before condemning a bad idea publicly, ask yourself: Do I really need to engage? Sometimes, the best approach is to let bad ideas starve from neglect. Silence, in this case, can be more powerful than debate.
This doesn’t mean ignoring every issue. Some ideas must be countered, especially when public safety is at stake. However, strategic silence—a conscious choice to prioritize spreading good ideas over fighting bad ones—can starve falsehoods of the attention they need to thrive. Ideas don’t just live because they’re true but because we keep them alive.
Strategies to effectively change minds
Changing someone’s mind is often less about facts and logic and more about relationships, psychology, and careful dialogue. Here are some ways to achieve it:
1. Develop a ‘scout mentality’: stay curious, not combative
Imagine two roles in a debate: a soldier and a scout. The soldier fights to win, defending their position at all costs. The scout explores the landscape, seeking the truth no matter where it leads. While the soldier mindset is common in disagreements—digging in, refusing to budge—the scout mentality is what creates genuine understanding.
The scout approach thrives on curiosity and collaboration. Instead of treating disagreements as battles, it reframes them into learning opportunities for those who cling to beliefs. Think about it: when someone challenges your beliefs, you can choose either defensiveness or discovery. The latter means asking questions like, “Why do you feel that way?” or “What led you to see it this way?” This approach invites conversation, not confrontation.
Instead of positioning yourself as an opponent, try becoming a partner in the search for clarity. For example, if someone says they distrust science, rather than arguing, you could explore their concerns together: “What about science feels unreliable to you?” This turns tension into teamwork. The goal isn’t to “win” or force agreement but to open space for reflection.
2. Consider starting closer to other’s existing beliefs.
The key is starting small and close to a person’s existing beliefs. Engaging with someone whose beliefs are slightly different from yours stands a better chance of success than confronting someone at the extreme end of the spectrum.
For example, if someone is skeptical about renewable energy and cling to their beliefs, you might focus on financial benefits like cost savings from solar panels rather than diving into the broader climate crisis. Begin with common ground and build from there.
3. Plant seeds of doubt and be patient with the process.
Another effective strategy is planting seeds of doubt in those who cling to beliefs. Share stories or examples that challenge assumptions without directly attacking the belief itself. If someone insists that a particular diet is the healthiest, you might share how another approach worked for you. These seeds encourage reconsideration over time. They’re nurtured as the individual reflects privately, away from the heat of disagreement.
Above all, patience matters. Changing a belief involves reconciling new ideas with one’s identity and values. Give people time to connect those dots. With steady, compassionate conversations and an emphasis on small steps, you set the stage for change to bloom naturally.
4. Fight bias in yourself.
It’s worth examining your own beliefs to avoid inadvertently projecting yourself onto others. Here’s how you can avoid falling into the trap:
- Seek opposing views. Regularly expose yourself to ideas contrary to your own.
- Ask questions. Why do you believe what you believe? Is there evidence against it?
- Admit when you’re wrong. Flexibility is a strength, not a weakness.
- Let go of ego. Separate your beliefs from your identity. It’s okay for them to evolve.
The path to shifting perspectives starts with empathy, kindness, and curiosity. Listen without judgment. Ask questions that open doors rather than close them. Focus your energy on strengthening connections, not winning arguments. Changing minds isn’t about tearing down.
It’s about offering a hand, sharing a moment, and walking the journey together as a united front. The truth has the best chance to thrive when planted in the soil of trust and nurtured with patience.
All my best on your journey,
Seline
Questions for you? Do you find it challenging to change beliefs you’ve held for many years? What has or hasn’t worked in shifting your beliefs for the better?
Did you like this post? Sign up below, and I’ll send you more awesome posts like this every week.
Have Your Say